↓ Skip to main content

Molecular diagnostic markers of Tachysurus fulvidraco and Leiocassis longirostris and their hybrids

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Molecular diagnostic markers of Tachysurus fulvidraco and Leiocassis longirostris and their hybrids
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3766-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongwei Liang, Shanshan Guo, Xiangzhong Luo, Zhong Li, Guiwei Zou

Abstract

Bagridae is an important family of catfishes and has a high market demand. Recently, more cultivable Bagridae fishes are being exploited in China, and hybridization of some species has been carried out to achieve better growth performance, favorable sex ratios and better disease resistance. Yet, these hybrids have further increased the difficulties of taxonomy identification due to morphological indistinguishableness. In this study, the molecular identification technologies for Tachysurus fulvidraco, Leiocassis longirostris sand their hybrids were successfully established by using mitochondrial COI and nuclear ITS sequences to identify the maternal and paternal lineage, respectively. These molecular diagnostic methods could also be used to manage breeding plans of hybrids, monitor and minimize the negative impacts of hybridization programs in aquaculture. Furthermore, our study could also provide a reference for establishing detection technique for hybrids in other groups of fishes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%