Title |
Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-012-0386-z |
Authors |
Toddi A. Steelman, Sarah McCaffrey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 293 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 60 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 19% |
Researcher | 44 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
Other | 46 | 15% |
Unknown | 63 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 65 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 39 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 7% |
Psychology | 14 | 5% |
Other | 65 | 21% |
Unknown | 82 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,491,162
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#766
of 1,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,032
of 172,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.