↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of glyphosate-based herbicides on disease resistance and health of crops: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Impacts of glyphosate-based herbicides on disease resistance and health of crops: a review
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12302-018-0131-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisy A. Martinez, Ulrich E. Loening, Margaret C. Graham

Abstract

Based on experimental data from laboratory and field, numerous authors have raised concern that exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) may pre-dispose crops to damage by microbial pathogens. In this review, we distinguish and evaluate two principal pathways by which GBHs may affect the susceptibility of crops to disease: pathway 1-via disruptions to rhizosphere microbial ecology, and pathway 2-via restriction of nutrients to crops. We conclude that GBHs have the potential to undermine crop health in a number of ways, including: (i) impairment of the innate physiological defences of glyphosate-sensitive (GS) cultivars by interruption of the shikimic acid pathway; (ii) impairment of physiological disease defences has also been shown to occur in some glyphosate-resistant (GR) cultivars, despite their engineered resistance to glyphosate's primary mode of action; (iii) interference with rhizosphere microbial ecology (in particular, GBHs have the potential to enhance the population and/or virulence of some phytopathogenic microbial species in the crop rhizosphere); and finally, (iv) the as yet incompletely elucidated reduction in the uptake and utilisation of nutrient metals by crops. Future progress will best be achieved when growers, regulators and industry collaborate to develop products, practices and policies that minimise the use of herbicides as far as possible and maximise their effectiveness when used, while facilitating optimised food production and security.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 28%
Environmental Science 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Chemistry 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,399,467
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#85
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,150
of 454,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.