↓ Skip to main content

Big data of tree species distributions: how big and how good?

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 404)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Big data of tree species distributions: how big and how good?
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40663-017-0120-0
Authors

Josep M. Serra-Diaz, Brian J. Enquist, Brian Maitner, Cory Merow, Jens-C. Svenning

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Master 28 12%
Other 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 34%
Environmental Science 49 21%
Computer Science 8 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,345,483
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#13
of 404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,416
of 475,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.