↓ Skip to main content

“Eratosthenes' measurement of the earth reconsidered”

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, March 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
“Eratosthenes' measurement of the earth reconsidered”
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, March 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00387726
Authors

Jacques Dutka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 38%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Engineering 2 15%
Physics and Astronomy 2 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#70
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,827
of 20,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them