| Title |
Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-017-0582-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Posadzy, Julie Desimpel, Filip Vanhoenacker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 38% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#834
of 1,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,494
of 454,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.