| Title |
Numerical Approaches to Spacetime Singularities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Living Reviews in Relativity, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.12942/lrr-2002-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beverly K. Berger |
| Abstract |
This Living Review updates a previous version [25] which is itself an update of a review article [31]. Numerical exploration of the properties of singularities could, in principle, yield detailed understanding of their nature in physically realistic cases. Examples of numerical investigations into the formation of naked singularities, critical behavior in collapse, passage through the Cauchy horizon, chaos of the Mixmaster singularity, and singularities in spatially inhomogeneous cosmologies are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 48% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,952,374
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#114
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,301
of 131,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.