↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of acute-to-chronic ratios of fish and Daphnia to predict acceptable no-effect levels

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of acute-to-chronic ratios of fish and Daphnia to predict acceptable no-effect levels
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12302-016-0084-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin May, Wiebke Drost, Sabine Germer, Tanja Juffernholz, Stefan Hahn

Abstract

Acute-to-chronic extrapolation is an important approach to predict acceptable no-effect levels from acute data which has some uncertainties, but is valuable for risk assessment of chemical substances. With regard to the still limited and heterogenic data of chronic fish tests, conclusions on aquatic hazard estimation need to be checked and the question arises whether the chronic toxicity to fish can be adequately derived from acute data. A comprehensive dataset including ecotoxicological studies of 203 substances was used to investigate acute-to-chronic ratios (ACR) for both fish and Daphnia. To address potential uncertainty parameters of the approach, the influence of the octanol-water partition coefficient Kow, the mode of action, and the acute toxicity levels on the ACR was evaluated. For industrial chemicals, median ACRs of 12.0 for fish and 8.8 for Daphnia and 90th percentiles of 68.0 and 50.2, respectively, were determined. The ACR for the most sensitive aquatic trophic level (ACRaqu) is derived by comparing the lowest acute and chronic effect value of Daphnia and fish. The median ACRaqu was 9.9, and the 90th percentile was determined to 58.5. The influence of the Kow on the ACR value was analysed and a correlation could not be confirmed. Non-polar narcosis was associated with a lower ACR, whereas polar narcosis was associated with an increased ACR. The result suggests that an acute-to-chronic extrapolation factor of 100 is protective for more than 90 % of the chemicals. Polar narcosis may represent a predictor for an increased ACR and an increased uncertainty of the approach. The result further suggests that a high Kow is probably not associated with increased ACRs and does not necessarily represent a determinant for chronic toxicity testing within this context.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 20%
Chemistry 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,543,662
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#212
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,038
of 312,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.