↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma possibly developed from the cut-end of small-sized adenocarcinoma in the lung periphery as recurrence 13 years after its wedge resection

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary adenocarcinoma possibly developed from the cut-end of small-sized adenocarcinoma in the lung periphery as recurrence 13 years after its wedge resection
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40792-017-0413-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takaomi Hanaoka, Makoto Kurai, Mitsuyo Okada, Satoshi Ishizone, Fumitoshi Karasawa, Akira Iizuka, Meguru Ikeyama, Jun Nakayama

Abstract

It is a big topic for general thoracic surgery whether still curability can be obtained by limited resection for peripheral small-sized nodules of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the current era of frequent computed tomography (CT) use. Accumulation of information on problematic cases would be meaningful for surgeons to select better surgical procedures. A 69-year-old man was pointed out an enlarged 2.1-cm solid nodule on the edge of staple line of the residual right upper lobe by chest CT. He had past history of the lung cancer surgery, wedge resection of the same right upper lobe 13 years ago. The pathological findings were 1.1-cm, p-TlbN0M0, p-stage IA2-adenocarcinoma. Thereafter, he received no adjuvant therapy. This time, the trans-bronchial lung biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma. After the completion lobectomy of the residual right upper lobe, the tumor was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma consistent with recurrence of small-sized adenocarcinoma in the lung periphery developed from the cut-end because of similarities between present and previous tumors on histopathology and p53-positivity. When limited resection has been performed for small-sized NSCLC presenting solid nodule on thin-slice CT images, long-term postoperative follow-up time will be necessary for monitoring, considering the possibility of cut-end recurrence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%