↓ Skip to main content

Conflicting Perspectives on Spotted Owls, Wildfire, and Forest Restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Conflicting Perspectives on Spotted Owls, Wildfire, and Forest Restoration
Published in
Fire Ecology, December 2017
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.130318020
Authors

Joseph L. Ganey, Ho Yi Wan, Samuel A. Cushman, Christina D. Vojta

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 28%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Environmental Science 14 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,609,310
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#70
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,534
of 415,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.