↓ Skip to main content

Conflicting Perspectives on Spotted Owls, Wildfire, and Forest Restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Conflicting Perspectives on Spotted Owls, Wildfire, and Forest Restoration
Published in
Fire Ecology, December 2017
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.130318020
Authors

Joseph L. Ganey, Ho Yi Wan, Samuel A. Cushman, Christina D. Vojta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Computer Science 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,543,662
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#109
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,545
of 437,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.