↓ Skip to main content

Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1099 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1141 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems
Published in
Oecologia, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1519-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy T. Austin, Laura Yahdjian, John M. Stark, Jayne Belnap, Amilcare Porporato, Urszula Norton, Damián A. Ravetta, Sean M. Schaeffer

Abstract

The episodic nature of water availability in arid and semiarid ecosystems has significant consequences on belowground carbon and nutrient cycling. Pulsed water events directly control belowground processes through soil wet-dry cycles. Rapid soil microbial response to incident moisture availability often results in almost instantaneous C and N mineralization, followed by shifts in C/N of microbially available substrate, and an offset in the balance between nutrient immobilization and mineralization. Nitrogen inputs from biological soil crusts are also highly sensitive to pulsed rain events, and nitrogen losses, particularly gaseous losses due to denitrification and nitrate leaching, are tightly linked to pulses of water availability. The magnitude of the effect of water pulses on carbon and nutrient pools, however, depends on the distribution of resource availability and soil organisms, both of which are strongly affected by the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of vegetation cover, topographic position and soil texture. The 'inverse texture hypothesis' for net primary production in water-limited ecosystems suggests that coarse-textured soils have higher NPP than fine-textured soils in very arid zones due to reduced evaporative losses, while NPP is greater in fine-textured soils in higher rainfall ecosystems due to increased water-holding capacity. With respect to belowground processes, fine-textured soils tend to have higher water-holding capacity and labile C and N pools than coarse-textured soils, and often show a much greater flush of N mineralization. The result of the interaction of texture and pulsed rainfall events suggests a corollary hypothesis for nutrient turnover in arid and semiarid ecosystems with a linear increase of N mineralization in coarse-textured soils, but a saturating response for fine-textured soils due to the importance of soil C and N pools. Seasonal distribution of water pulses can lead to the accumulation of mineral N in the dry season, decoupling resource supply and microbial and plant demand, and resulting in increased losses via other pathways and reduction in overall soil nutrient pools. The asynchrony of resource availability, particularly nitrogen versus water due to pulsed water events, may be central to understanding the consequences for ecosystem nutrient retention and long-term effects on carbon and nutrient pools. Finally, global change effects due to changes in the nature and size of pulsed water events and increased asynchrony of water availability and growing season will likely have impacts on biogeochemical cycling in water-limited ecosystems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 3%
Argentina 7 <1%
China 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Other 18 2%
Unknown 1062 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 247 22%
Researcher 237 21%
Student > Master 161 14%
Student > Bachelor 81 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 7%
Other 193 17%
Unknown 145 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 416 36%
Environmental Science 346 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 114 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 2%
Engineering 14 1%
Other 37 3%
Unknown 195 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,872,021
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,238
of 4,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,350
of 54,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.