↓ Skip to main content

Frequency and prognostic impact of basic critical care echocardiography abnormalities in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Frequency and prognostic impact of basic critical care echocardiography abnormalities in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13613-017-0343-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kay Choong See, Jeffrey Ng, Wen Ting Siow, Venetia Ong, Jason Phua

Abstract

Among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), apart from acute cor pulmonale (ACP), the frequency and prognostic impact of basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) abnormalities are not well defined. Observational study of patients with ARDS, admitted from September 2012 to May 2014, who underwent BCCE within 48 h of admission to a 20-bed medical ICU. We examined the association of two major BCCE-detected abnormalities (left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and severe ACP) with ICU/hospital mortality and ICU/hospital length of stay. Multivariable models adjusted for age and illness severity. Of 234 patients with ARDS (age 62.3 ± 14.3 years; 88/37.6% female; APACHE II 26.8 ± 8.3; 26.5% ICU mortality; 32.1% hospital mortality), 94 (40.2%) had at least one major BCCE-detected abnormality. The more common major BCCE abnormality found was severe ACP (28.2%), followed by left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (16.2%). On multivariate analysis, only severe ACP remained significantly associated with ICU/hospital mortality. Hospital mortality for mild, moderate and severe ARDS was 17.0, 27.9 and 50.0%, respectively (without severe ACP), and was 29.2, 48.3 and 53.8%, respectively (with severe ACP). BCCE abnormalities were common, but only severe ACP had prognostic significance in ARDS, identifying patients who are at increased risk of ICU and hospital mortality. The presence of severe ACP appears to upstage ARDS severity by one level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 56%
Engineering 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,152,902
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#470
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,915
of 442,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.