| Title |
Mechanisms and etiologies of thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: impact of extensive investigations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-014-0024-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadiejda Antier, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Jean-Marc Doise, Robin Noel, Emmanuel Demaistre, Hervé Devilliers |
| Abstract |
Thrombocytopenia is common in the intensive care unit. Potential mechanisms and etiologies behind this phenomenon are multiple and often entangled. We assessed the effect of a systematic approach, using routinely available tests, on the proportion of patients in whom the mechanism (primary objective) and etiology (secondary objective) of thrombocytopenia in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) could be identified. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 31% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 66% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,877,610
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#536
of 1,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,658
of 229,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.