↓ Skip to main content

In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections

Overview of attention for article published in Political Behavior, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections
Published in
Political Behavior, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11109-010-9133-x
Authors

Kyle C. Kopko, Sarah McKinnon Bryner, Jeffrey Budziak, Christopher J. Devine, Steven P. Nawara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 12%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 29 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 35%
Researcher 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 53%
Psychology 9 26%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,361,822
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Political Behavior
#754
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,564
of 105,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Behavior
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.