| Title |
Baastrup’s disease (kissing spines syndrome): a pictorial review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-014-0376-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dimitrios K. Filippiadis, Argyro Mazioti, S. Argentos, G. Anselmetti, O. Papakonstantinou, N. Kelekis, Alexis Kelekis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 21% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#23,381,499
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#1,123
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,773
of 366,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.