↓ Skip to main content

Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding

Overview of attention for article published in Rice, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
Title
Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding
Published in
Rice, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nonoy Bandillo, Chitra Raghavan, Pauline Andrea Muyco, Ma Anna Lynn Sevilla, Irish T Lobina, Christine Jade Dilla-Ermita, Chih-Wei Tung, Susan McCouch, Michael Thomson, Ramil Mauleon, Rakesh Kumar Singh, Glenn Gregorio, Edilberto Redoña, Hei Leung

Abstract

This article describes the development of Multi-parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross populations (MAGIC) in rice and discusses potential applications for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and for rice varietal development. We have developed 4 multi-parent populations: indica MAGIC (8 indica parents); MAGIC plus (8 indica parents with two additional rounds of 8-way F1 inter-crossing); japonica MAGIC (8 japonica parents); and Global MAGIC (16 parents - 8 indica and 8 japonica). The parents used in creating these populations are improved varieties with desirable traits for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, yield, and grain quality. The purpose is to fine map QTLs for multiple traits and to directly and indirectly use the highly recombined lines in breeding programs. These MAGIC populations provide a useful germplasm resource with diverse allelic combinations to be exploited by the rice community.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 345 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 95 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 24%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 255 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 8%
Engineering 5 1%
Computer Science 4 1%
Arts and Humanities 3 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 59 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,690,798
of 18,796,975 outputs
Outputs from Rice
#67
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,526
of 321,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rice
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,796,975 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.