↓ Skip to main content

Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding

Overview of attention for article published in Rice, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
Title
Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding
Published in
Rice, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nonoy Bandillo, Chitra Raghavan, Pauline Muyco, Ma Anna Lynn Sevilla, Irish T Lobina, Christine Dilla-Ermita, Chih-Wei Tung, Susan McCouch, Michael Thomson, Ramil Mauleon, Rakesh Singh, Glenn Gregorio, Edilberto Redoña, Hei Leung

Abstract

This article describes the development of Multi-parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross populations (MAGIC) in rice and discusses potential applications for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and for rice varietal development. We have developed 4 multi-parent populations: indica MAGIC (8 indica parents); MAGIC plus (8 indica parents with two additional rounds of 8-way F1 inter-crossing); japonica MAGIC (8 japonica parents); and Global MAGIC (16 parents - 8 indica and 8 japonica). The parents used in creating these populations are improved varieties with desirable traits for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, yield, and grain quality. The purpose is to fine map QTLs for multiple traits and to directly and indirectly use the highly recombined lines in breeding programs. These MAGIC populations provide a useful germplasm resource with diverse allelic combinations to be exploited by the rice community.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 291 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 87 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 26%
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 24 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 235 77%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Engineering 4 1%
Computer Science 4 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 34 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,480,117
of 15,341,807 outputs
Outputs from Rice
#53
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,303
of 302,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rice
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,341,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.