↓ Skip to main content

Heterotaxy syndromes and abnormal bowel rotation

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Heterotaxy syndromes and abnormal bowel rotation
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00247-013-2861-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverley Newman, Raji Koppolu, Daniel Murphy, Karl Sylvester

Abstract

Bowel rotation abnormalities in heterotaxy are common. As more children survive cardiac surgery, the management of gastrointestinal abnormalities has become controversial.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 72%
Unspecified 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#9,769,681
of 12,226,394 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#778
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,600
of 273,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,394 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.