↓ Skip to main content

(Un)reliability of equivalent forms of the Taiwanese tour guide English tests

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 192)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
(Un)reliability of equivalent forms of the Taiwanese tour guide English tests
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40468-014-0007-8
Authors

Peter J Gilks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 50%
Linguistics 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,616,014
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#36
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,572
of 262,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.