↓ Skip to main content

How unemployment insurance savings accounts affect employment duration: evidence from Chile

Overview of attention for article published in IZA Journal of Labor & Development     , November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
How unemployment insurance savings accounts affect employment duration: evidence from Chile
Published in
IZA Journal of Labor & Development     , November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-9020-2-9
Authors

Paula Nagler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 47%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor & Development    
#27
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,355
of 317,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor & Development    
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.