| Title |
Peripheral heart action (PHA) training as a valid substitute to high intensity interval training to improve resting cardiovascular changes and autonomic adaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3057-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Piras, Michela Persiani, Nicholas Damiani, Monica Perazzolo, Milena Raffi |
| Abstract |
The present study evaluated the effects of peripheral heart action training compared with high intensity interval training on changes in autonomic regulation and physical fitness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 47 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#559,196
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#152
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,648
of 369,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.