↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac echo-lab productivity in times of economic austerity

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac echo-lab productivity in times of economic austerity
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-703
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasiliki K Katsi, Dimitrios A Vrachatis, Anastasia Politi, Manto Papageorgiou, Anastasios Koumoulidis, Ioannis Vlasseros, Manolis Vavuranakis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Christodoulos Stefanadis, Ioannis Kallikazaros, Kyriakos Souliotis

Abstract

The present study attempts to offer insight into the volume, cost, and productivity of the operation of a cardiac echocardiographic laboratory (echo-lab) in a major public hospital of Greece and thus to contribute, on a practical level, to the widening of knowledge in the strategic field of secondary and tertiary healthcare management. The conducted research includes the basic step of the deployment of a primary data registry in the echo-lab and unfolds in three levels, i.e. the variability measurement of the quantity and cost of medical services provided to different patient populations, the assessment of operating costs and the development of productivity indexes. The results show that the mean costs of provision do change among distinct patient populations. The most important, from a financial standpoint, population cluster appears to be the one corresponding to outpatients. Productivity indices presented in this analysis constitute an essential piece of information which the public healthcare system is currently largely lacking, and which, combined with the pricing and the diagnosis-related group coding system of hospitals, can be used to improve efficiency in the management of secondary and tertiary care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Unspecified 2 12%
Computer Science 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,678,307
of 20,303,071 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#369
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,460
of 339,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#71
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,303,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.