↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac echo-lab productivity in times of economic austerity

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac echo-lab productivity in times of economic austerity
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-703
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasiliki K Katsi, Dimitrios A Vrachatis, Anastasia Politi, Manto Papageorgiou, Anastasios Koumoulidis, Ioannis Vlasseros, Manolis Vavuranakis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Christodoulos Stefanadis, Ioannis Kallikazaros, Kyriakos Souliotis

Abstract

The present study attempts to offer insight into the volume, cost, and productivity of the operation of a cardiac echocardiographic laboratory (echo-lab) in a major public hospital of Greece and thus to contribute, on a practical level, to the widening of knowledge in the strategic field of secondary and tertiary healthcare management. The conducted research includes the basic step of the deployment of a primary data registry in the echo-lab and unfolds in three levels, i.e. the variability measurement of the quantity and cost of medical services provided to different patient populations, the assessment of operating costs and the development of productivity indexes. The results show that the mean costs of provision do change among distinct patient populations. The most important, from a financial standpoint, population cluster appears to be the one corresponding to outpatients. Productivity indices presented in this analysis constitute an essential piece of information which the public healthcare system is currently largely lacking, and which, combined with the pricing and the diagnosis-related group coding system of hospitals, can be used to improve efficiency in the management of secondary and tertiary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Computer Science 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,805,811
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#956
of 1,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,106
of 372,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#49
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.