↓ Skip to main content

Art, (In)Visibility, and Ebola

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Art, (In)Visibility, and Ebola
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11673-014-9589-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leigh E. Rich, Michael A. Ashby, David M. Shaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Unspecified 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Other 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,170,042
of 13,029,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#228
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,838
of 295,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,029,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.