| Title |
Comparison of the Cecal Microbiota of Domestic and Wild Turkeys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Ecology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00248-007-9349-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra J Scupham, Toni G. Patton, Elizabeth Bent, Darrell O. Bayles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,638,768
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#275
of 2,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,003
of 172,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them