↓ Skip to main content

Gamification and service marketing

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
Title
Gamification and service marketing
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger Conaway, Mario Cortés Garay

Abstract

Our paper addresses the development of the gamification concept with business applications. We report on our survey of customers and managers seeking to participate in gamification on their websites. We examined both customer and manager perspectives and compare survey results in terms of service marketing and characteristics of consumers who engage with gamification platforms. Our data supported a design theory delineating four key characteristics in gamification platforms that attract consumers toward an enterprise's website. Those features attract individuals through (1) Progress Paths, (2) Feedback and Reward, (3) Social Connection, and (4) Attractiveness of the site. Results from the managers' survey reflected key characteristics that must exist for implementation of a gamification platform. The data revealed a particular demographic profile of a gamification individual drawn to a website. These findings may help company managers who wish to adopt a gamification platform in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 425 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Lecturer 34 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 129 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 128 30%
Computer Science 50 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 7%
Social Sciences 28 6%
Engineering 15 3%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 134 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,692,476
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#297
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,619
of 262,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#21
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.