↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Proceedings of the 16th Annual UT-KBRIN Bioinformatics Summit 2017: bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Correction to: Proceedings of the 16th Annual UT-KBRIN Bioinformatics Summit 2017: bioinformatics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1880-9
Authors

Eric C. Rouchka, Julia L. Chariker, David Tieri, Juw W. Park

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#11,868,189
of 13,382,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,593
of 5,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,102
of 308,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#405
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,382,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.