↓ Skip to main content

Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economics & Finance, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries
Published in
Journal of Economics & Finance, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/bf02761488
Authors

Clara Delavallade

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Unspecified 7 6%
Other 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 35 32%
Social Sciences 33 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 18%
Unspecified 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 7 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,481,770
of 12,507,666 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economics & Finance
#7
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,468
of 229,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economics & Finance
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,507,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them