↓ Skip to main content

Bladder cancer discussed on the internet: a systematic analysis of gender differences of initial posters on an online discussion board

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Bladder cancer discussed on the internet: a systematic analysis of gender differences of initial posters on an online discussion board
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-445
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yannick Lippka, Oliver Patschan, Tilmann Todenhöfer, Christian Schwentner, Andreas Gutzeit, Axel S Merseburger, Marcus Horstmann

Abstract

To evaluate gender differences of initial posters in threads dealing with bladder cancer on an online discussion board.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Librarian 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Psychology 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,922,782
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#736
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,323
of 197,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#38
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.