↓ Skip to main content

Deletion of Cdc42 in embryonic cardiomyocytes results in right ventricle hypoplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Deletion of Cdc42 in embryonic cardiomyocytes results in right ventricle hypoplasia
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40169-017-0171-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Liu, Jian Wang, Jieli Li, Rui Wang, Binu Tharakan, Shenyuan L. Zhang, Carl W. Tong, Xu Peng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#590
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,335
of 344,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.