↓ Skip to main content

Exercise and Sport Performance with Low Doses of Caffeine

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
126 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
14 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
990 Mendeley
Title
Exercise and Sport Performance with Low Doses of Caffeine
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0257-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence L. Spriet

Abstract

Caffeine is a popular work-enhancing supplement that has been actively researched since the 1970s. The majority of research has examined the effects of moderate to high caffeine doses (5-13 mg/kg body mass) on exercise and sport. These caffeine doses have profound effects on the responses to exercise at the whole-body level and are associated with variable results and some undesirable side effects. Low doses of caffeine (<3 mg/kg body mass, ~200 mg) are also ergogenic in some exercise and sport situations, although this has been less well studied. Lower caffeine doses (1) do not alter the peripheral whole-body responses to exercise; (2) improve vigilance, alertness, and mood and cognitive processes during and after exercise; and (3) are associated with few, if any, side effects. Therefore, the ergogenic effect of low caffeine doses appears to result from alterations in the central nervous system. However, several aspects of consuming low doses of caffeine remain unresolved and suffer from a paucity of research, including the potential effects on high-intensity sprint and burst activities. The responses to low doses of caffeine are also variable and athletes need to determine whether the ingestion of ~200 mg of caffeine before and/or during training and competitions is ergogenic on an individual basis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 990 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Unknown 976 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 274 28%
Student > Master 153 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 6%
Student > Postgraduate 62 6%
Other 43 4%
Other 143 14%
Unknown 251 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 309 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 106 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 103 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 3%
Other 111 11%
Unknown 267 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#112,687
of 26,191,377 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#95
of 2,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#956
of 274,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,191,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.