↓ Skip to main content

Relationships between priming and subsequent recognition memory

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Relationships between priming and subsequent recognition memory
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiyofumi Miyoshi, Takehiro Minamoto, Hiroshi Ashida

Abstract

A discrepancy exists among previous studies regarding whether priming and subsequent recognition memory are positively or negatively correlated. We consider that the difference in recognition memory measures used in these studies accounts for the discrepancy. To examine this, we introduced three different recognition measures and reexamined the relationship between priming and subsequent recognition. Participants learned stimulus words in the first encoding block while performing an abstract/concrete decision task. In the second encoding block, a priming test was conducted, followed by a surprise recognition memory test. Results showed that the hit rate and hit rate (pHit)-false-alarm rate (pFA) positively correlated with priming. However, the difference between hit rates for the twice- and once-encoded stimuli, which can reflect the representations acquired at the second exposure in particular, did not significantly correlate with priming. These results suggest that priming and subsequent recognition relate positively because of the common representations acquired at the initial encoding. Furthermore, the present results are consistent with a previous study that failed to reproduce the negative correlation between priming and subsequent recognition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%