| Title |
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John F. Crary, John Q. Trojanowski, Julie A. Schneider, Jose F. Abisambra, Erin L. Abner, Irina Alafuzoff, Steven E. Arnold, Johannes Attems, Thomas G. Beach, Eileen H. Bigio, Nigel J. Cairns, Dennis W. Dickson, Marla Gearing, Lea T. Grinberg, Patrick R. Hof, Bradley T. Hyman, Kurt Jellinger, Gregory A. Jicha, Gabor G. Kovacs, David S. Knopman, Julia Kofler, Walter A. Kukull, Ian R. Mackenzie, Eliezer Masliah, Ann McKee, Thomas J. Montine, Melissa E. Murray, Janna H. Neltner, Ismael Santa-Maria, William W. Seeley, Alberto Serrano-Pozo, Michael L. Shelanski, Thor Stein, Masaki Takao, Dietmar R. Thal, Jonathan B. Toledo, Juan C. Troncoso, Jean Paul Vonsattel, Charles L. White, Thomas Wisniewski, Randall L. Woltjer, Masahito Yamada, Peter T. Nelson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 40% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Japan | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 740 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 722 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 121 | 16% |
| Researcher | 107 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 6% |
| Other | 138 | 19% |
| Unknown | 179 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 168 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 6% |
| Psychology | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 11% |
| Unknown | 208 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#531,810
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#67
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,477
of 275,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.