| Title |
A fast image simulation algorithm for scanning transmission electron microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40679-017-0046-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin Ophus |
| Abstract |
Image simulation for scanning transmission electron microscopy at atomic resolution for samples with realistic dimensions can require very large computation times using existing simulation algorithms. We present a new algorithm named PRISM that combines features of the two most commonly used algorithms, namely the Bloch wave and multislice methods. PRISM uses a Fourier interpolation factor f that has typical values of 4-20 for atomic resolution simulations. We show that in many cases PRISM can provide a speedup that scales with f(4) compared to multislice simulations, with a negligible loss of accuracy. We demonstrate the usefulness of this method with large-scale scanning transmission electron microscopy image simulations of a crystalline nanoparticle on an amorphous carbon substrate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 25% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 65 | 36% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 14% |
| Engineering | 15 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,120,813
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging
#15
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,212
of 314,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them