↓ Skip to main content

Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3809-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Xiao, Gang Shi, Jin Zhang, Jian-Guo Cao, Li-Jun Liu, Ting-Hao Chen, Zhi-Zhou Li, Hong Wang, Han Zhang, Zhao-Fen Lin, Jun-Hua Lu, Tian Yang

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been rapidly applied worldwide recently. The issue of surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy needs to be re-investigated and analyzed along with this trend. This study aimed to identify risk factors of SSI after appendectomy in recent years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 54%
Engineering 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,728,987
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,369
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,441
of 256,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#90
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.