↓ Skip to main content

Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3809-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Xiao, Gang Shi, Jin Zhang, Jian-Guo Cao, Li-Jun Liu, Ting-Hao Chen, Zhi-Zhou Li, Hong Wang, Han Zhang, Zhao-Fen Lin, Jun-Hua Lu, Tian Yang

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been rapidly applied worldwide recently. The issue of surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy needs to be re-investigated and analyzed along with this trend. This study aimed to identify risk factors of SSI after appendectomy in recent years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 65%
Unspecified 8 15%
Engineering 4 7%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#9,381,602
of 12,229,156 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,593
of 3,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,568
of 223,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#92
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,229,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.