↓ Skip to main content

Imaging adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Imaging adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
Published in
Insights into Imaging, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13244-014-0357-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Lee, Abhishek Chaturvedi

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used in adults following failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, after cardiac surgery or in cases of severe respiratory failure. Knowledge of the different types of ECMO circuits, expected locations of cannulas and imaging appearance of complications is essential for accurate imaging interpretation and diagnosis. Commonly encountered complications are malposition of cannulas, adjacent or distal haemorrhage, stroke, stasis thrombus in access vessels, and distal emboli. This article will describe the imaging appearance of different ECMO circuits in adults as well as commonly encountered complications. If a CT (computed tomography) angiogram is being performed on these patients to evaluate for pulmonary embolism, the scan may be suboptimal from siphoning off of the contrast by the ECMO. In such cases, an optimal image can be obtained by lowering the flow rate of the ECMO circuit or by disabling the circuit for the duration of image acquisition. Key Points • Femoroatrial VV ECMO: femoral vein drainage cannula and right atrial return cannula. • Femorofemoral VV ECMO: return and drainage cannulas placed in femoral veins. • Dual-lumen single cannula VV ECMO: via the right IJ/Femoral vein with the tip in the IVC/SVC. • Peripheral VA ECMO: peripheral venous drainage cannula and peripheral arterial return cannula. • Central VA ECMO: direct right atrial drainage cannula and aortic return cannula.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Other 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 73%
Engineering 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Materials Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,412,839
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#431
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,565
of 259,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.