| Title |
Aspects of Common Loon (Gavia immer) feeding biology on its breeding ground
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrobiologia, March 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00023169 |
| Authors |
J. F. Barr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,386
of 26,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.