↓ Skip to main content

A method for evaluating discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Social Networks, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A method for evaluating discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms
Published in
Computational Social Networks, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40649-017-0045-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Lamprecht, Markus Strohmaier, Denis Helic

Abstract

Recommendations are increasingly used to support and enable discovery, browsing, and exploration of items. This is especially true for entertainment platforms such as Netflix or YouTube, where frequently, no clear categorization of items exists. Yet, the suitability of a recommendation algorithm to support these use cases cannot be comprehensively evaluated by any recommendation evaluation measures proposed so far. In this paper, we propose a method to expand the repertoire of existing recommendation evaluation techniques with a method to evaluate the discoverability and navigability of recommendation algorithms. The proposed method tackles this by means of first evaluating the discoverability of recommendation algorithms by investigating structural properties of the resulting recommender systems in terms of bow tie structure, and path lengths. Second, the method evaluates navigability by simulating three different models of information seeking scenarios and measuring the success rates. We show the feasibility of our method by applying it to four non-personalized recommendation algorithms on three data sets and also illustrate its applicability to personalized algorithms. Our work expands the arsenal of evaluation techniques for recommendation algorithms, extends from a one-click-based evaluation towards multi-click analysis, and presents a general, comprehensive method to evaluating navigability of arbitrary recommendation algorithms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%