Title |
The short-term skeleto-dental effects of a new spring for the intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth in open bite patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40510-014-0056-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Riaan Foot, Oyku Dalci, Carmen Gonzales, Nour Eldin Tarraf, M Ali Darendeliler |
Abstract |
The technology surrounding temporary skeletal anchorage devices has improved in leaps and bounds. However, no specific auxiliary exists for the intrusion of molars in conjunction with these devices and currently clinicians are forced to make do with available force delivery materials. A new intrusion auxiliary, the Sydney Intrusion Spring (SIS), was designed to facilitate intrusion without frequent need for reactivation or tissue irritation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 24% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 60% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#130
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,696
of 263,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.