↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Improved treatment of Asthma by using natural sources of antioxidants

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Retraction Note: Improved treatment of Asthma by using natural sources of antioxidants
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nguyen Van Toan, Tran Thi Hanh

Abstract

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-278.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Linguistics 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,266,387
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#198
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,125
of 252,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#9
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.