↓ Skip to main content

X-ray tomography of large wooden artworks: the case study of "Doppio corpo" by Pietro Piffetti

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
X-ray tomography of large wooden artworks: the case study of "Doppio corpo" by Pietro Piffetti
Published in
Heritage Science, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40494-014-0019-9
Authors

Alessandro Re, Fauzia Albertin, Chiara Avataneo, Rosa Brancaccio, Jacopo Corsi, Giorgio Cotto, Stefania De Blasi, Giovanni Dughera, Elisabetta Durisi, Walter Ferrarese, Annamaria Giovagnoli, Novella Grassi, Alessandro Lo Giudice, Paolo Mereu, Giorgia Mila, Marco Nervo, Nadia Pastrone, Francesco Prino, Luciano Ramello, Massimo Ravera, Chiara Ricci, Alessandra Romero, Roberto Sacchi, Amedeo Staiano, Lorenzo Visca, Lorenzo Zamprotta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 10 20%
Other 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 10 20%
Physics and Astronomy 9 18%
Arts and Humanities 5 10%
Computer Science 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,306,466
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#313
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,173
of 238,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.