↓ Skip to main content

Behavior believability in virtual worlds: agents acting when they need to

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Behavior believability in virtual worlds: agents acting when they need to
Published in
SpringerPlus, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikos Avradinis, Themis Panayiotopoulos, George Anastassakis

Abstract

Believability has been a perennial goal for the intelligent virtual agent community. One important aspect of believability largely consists in demonstrating autonomous behavior, consistent with the agent's personality and motivational state, as well as the world conditions. Autonomy, on behalf of the agent, implies the existence of an internal structure and mechanism that allows the agent to have its own needs and interests, based on which the agent will dynamically select and generate goals that will in turn lead to self-determined behavior. Intrinsic motivation allows the agent to function and demonstrate behavior, even when no external stimulus is present, due to the constant change of its internal emotional and physiological state. The concept of motivation has already been investigated by research works on intelligent agents, trying to achieve autonomy. The current work presents an architecture and model to represent and manage internal driving factors in intelligent virtual agents, using the concept of motivations. Based on Maslow and Alderfer's bio-psychological needs theories, we present a motivational approach to represent human needs and produce emergent behavior through motivation synthesis. Particular attention is given to basic, physiological level needs, which are the basis of behavior and can produce tendency to action even when there is no other interaction with the environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 34%
Psychology 5 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,236,620
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,461
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,123
of 195,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#65
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.