↓ Skip to main content

Analytical modeling of gas production rate in tight channel sand formation and optimization of artificial fracture

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Analytical modeling of gas production rate in tight channel sand formation and optimization of artificial fracture
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2176-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruifei Wang, Hongqing Song, Hewei Tang, Yuhe Wang, John Killough, Gang Huang

Abstract

Permeability variation in tight channel sand formation makes an important role in gas production. Based on the features of channel sand formation, a mathematical model has been established considering anisotropy of permeability. The analytical solutions were derived for productivity of both vertical wells and vertically fractured wells. Simulation results show that, gas production rate of anisotropic channel sand formation is less than that of isotropic formation. For vertically fractured well, artificial fracture direction, drainage radius, permeability ratio and fracture half-length have considerable influence on production rate. The optimum fracture direction should be deviated less than π/8 from the maximum permeability direction (or the channel direction). In addition, the analytical model was verified by in situ measured data. The research provides theoretical basis for the development of tight channel sand gas reservoirs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 44%
Energy 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%