↓ Skip to main content

A climate change simulation starting from 1935

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
A climate change simulation starting from 1935
Published in
Climate Dynamics, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00211674
Authors

U Cubasch, G C Hegerl, A Hellbach, H Höck, U Mikolajewicz, B D Santer, R Voss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 88%
Unspecified 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,053,671
of 12,220,104 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#998
of 2,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,540
of 211,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#27
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,220,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.