↓ Skip to main content

Proteomics analysis of metabolically engineered yeast cells and medium-chained hydrocarbon biofuel precursors synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Proteomics analysis of metabolically engineered yeast cells and medium-chained hydrocarbon biofuel precursors synthesis
Published in
AMB Express, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13568-014-0061-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiang Li, Wei Ning Chen

Abstract

Recently, various biofuels have been synthesized through metabolic engineering approaches to meet the exploding energy demands. Hydrocarbon biofuels, energy-equivalent to petroleum-based fuels, are identified as promising replacements for petroleum. Metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of synthesize precursors of medium-chained hydrocarbons is proposed in this study. The hydroperoxide pathway introduced in S. cerevisiae consisted of lipoxygenase (LOX) and hydroperoxide lyase (HPL) from almond, which catalyzes linoleic acid to 3(Z)-nonenal, the precursor for medium-chained hydrocarbon biofuels. Proteomics study showed that 31 proteins displayed different expression levels among four functional strains and most of them were related to carbohydrate metabolism and protein synthesis, suggested prospective capabilities of energy generation and exogenous protein synthesis. Biotransformation efficiency studies carried out by GC-FID were in accordance with the expectations. The highest yield of 3(Z)-nonenal was up to 1.21 ± 0.05 mg/L with the carbon recovery of up to 12.4%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
China 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Engineering 3 16%
Chemistry 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#796
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,224
of 235,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.