| Title |
Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Ecology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00248-012-0159-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans W. Paerl, Timothy G. Otten |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Mali | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1285 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 219 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 207 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 177 | 14% |
| Researcher | 165 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 83 | 6% |
| Other | 152 | 12% |
| Unknown | 308 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 334 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 287 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 86 | 7% |
| Engineering | 69 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 4% |
| Other | 121 | 9% |
| Unknown | 364 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,345,686
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#100
of 2,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,158
of 296,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.