Title |
Soil or fire: what causes treeless sedgelands in Tasmanian wet forests?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant and Soil, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11104-017-3386-7 |
Authors |
David M. J. S. Bowman, George L. W. Perry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 17% |
New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 21% |
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 9 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,744,767
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#737
of 3,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,431
of 322,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#18
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.