Title |
Cashew, from seed to market: a review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13593-014-0240-7 |
Authors |
Bianca Dendena, Stefano Corsi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 291 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 46 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
Researcher | 35 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
Other | 40 | 14% |
Unknown | 91 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 26% |
Engineering | 20 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 4% |
Chemistry | 10 | 3% |
Other | 46 | 16% |
Unknown | 114 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,777,653
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#376
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,649
of 228,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.