Title |
Centrally Inserted External Catheters and Totally Implantable Ports for the Delivery of Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Device-Related Complications
|
---|---|
Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00270-013-0771-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Kulkarni, O. Wu, R. Kasthuri, Jon G. Moss |
Abstract |
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risks of complications (infectious and non-infectious) including the need for device removal associated with centrally inserted external catheters compared with totally implantable ports in patients undergoing chemotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,917,976
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,299
of 2,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,215
of 212,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.