↓ Skip to main content

Pectoral nerves (PECS) and intercostal nerve block for cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Pectoral nerves (PECS) and intercostal nerve block for cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Fujiwara, Nobuyasu Komasawa, Toshiaki Minami

Abstract

A 71-year-old man was scheduled to undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRTD) implantation. He was combined with severe chronic heart failure due to ischemic heart disease. NYHA class was 3 to 4 and electrocardiogram showed non-sustained ventricular. Ejection fraction was about 20% revealed by transthoracic echocardiogram. He was also on several anticoagulation medications. We planned to implant the device under the greater pectoral muscle. As general anesthesia was considered risky, monitored anesthesia care utilizing peripheral nerve block and slight sedation was scheduled. Pectoral nerves (PECS) block and intercostal block was performed under ultrasonography with ropivacaine. For sedation during the procedure, continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine without a loading dose was performed. The procedure lasted about 3 hours, but the patient showed no pain or restlessness. Combination of PECS block and intercostal block may provide effective analgesia for CRTD implantation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Design 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 27%