@glupyan @ChimpsAhoi @MarcusPerlman I quite liked this paper, which argues that Hockett's approach to design features is a "non-starter". One of the critiques they raise is the focus on surface level features, rather than underlying cognitive capacities:
5,975 followers
3 followers
Language Evolution: Why Hockett’s Design Features are a Non-Starter #LanguageEvolution #Language Source: @NIH https://t.co/XlPD60OLDe
472 followers
https://t.co/N00zpW55BW not to be confused with https://t.co/akw26x0X0J Also "Language Evolution: Why Hockett’s Design Features are a Non-Starter" https://t.co/GFWEEkcedo
2,521 followers
583 followers
@psmaldino Hockett 1960, The Origin of Speech followed by Language Evolution: Why Hockett’s Design Features are a Non-Starter https://t.co/HuDHr3bGKy
1,680 followers
Language Evolution: Why Hockett’s Design Features are a Non-Starter - Springer https://t.co/RZZtqhf7sl
9 followers
Why Hockett's design features are a non-starter for research into EVOLUTION of LANGUAGE? http://t.co/BPsm5yRATO