↓ Skip to main content

Benefit of Endermology on Indurations and Panniculitis/Lipoatrophy During Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Long-Term Treatment with Glatiramer Acetate

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Benefit of Endermology on Indurations and Panniculitis/Lipoatrophy During Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Long-Term Treatment with Glatiramer Acetate
Published in
Advances in Therapy, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12325-014-0137-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Márquez-Rebollo, Luisa Vergara-Carrasco, Rosa Díaz-Navarro, Delia Rubio-Fernández, Pablo Francoli-Martínez, Rainel Sánchez-De la Rosa

Abstract

Use of endermology (Endermologie(®)), which consists of a deep mechanical massage, in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving glatiramer acetate suggested improvements in injection-site indurations and panniculitis/lipoatrophy in our previous pilot experience. We aimed to assess the effect of endermology in a larger population of patients with multiple sclerosis receiving glatiramer acetate in clinical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,323,500
of 7,380,153 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#305
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,876
of 178,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,380,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.